Big Tech Coach

Push vs. Pull Models in System Design: Optimizing Server-Client Communications for Efficiency and Scalability

Jun 11, 2024
Explore the differences between push vs. pull models in system design for optimized server-client communication.
In the ever-evolving landscape of server-client communications, establishing a robust and efficient system for file updates is paramount. Our goal is to create a lightweight, scalable, and unidirectional connection that harnesses modern technologies to deliver reliability and simplicity. As we navigate through the architectural choices, the distinction between push and pull models becomes crucial, each offering unique advantages tailored to different operational needs.

Exploring Communication Models

When designing systems for efficient data transfer, the choice between push and pull models is pivotal. Here, we delve into the mechanics and implications of each model to discern the best fit for our file update needs.

Pull Model

notion image
The pull model is grounded in the traditional request-response framework. Clients periodically request information from the server, checking if new data is available.
Flow of the Pull Model:
  • Client Request: The client sends a request to the server to check for updates.
  • Server Response: The server processes the request and responds with the available data.
  • Periodic Polling: Even if no new information is available, the client continues to make requests at regular intervals.
The pull model faces several significant challenges that can impact system efficiency. Firstly, Delayed Updates are common, as there may be a lag in data reception dependent on how often the client requests updates. This periodic checking can delay the delivery of critical information. Secondly, there's the issue of Increased Server Load. Continuous polling demands substantial resources and can lead to server overload, particularly when updates are infrequent, potentially degrading performance and user experience.
For scenarios where updates are less critical and can tolerate some delays, the pull model may suffice. However, its limitations make it less suitable for applications requiring timely data synchronization.

Push Model

notion image
The push model facilitates an active data transfer where the server sends updates as soon as they become available, without waiting for a request from the client.

Long Polling

notion image
A refined approach within the push paradigm, long polling involves clients making a request to the server which keeps the connection open until an update is available.
Flow of Long Polling:
  • Initial Request: Clients send a request using standard HTTP.
  • Hold and Wait: The server does not respond immediately but waits until new data is ready.
  • Server Response: Once data is available, the server sends a response back to the client.
  • New Request: The client may immediately make another request to continue the process, reducing the likelihood of missed updates.
While more efficient than standard polling, long polling still consumes resources by keeping connections open, potentially leading to scalability issues under heavy load.


notion image
WebSockets offer a robust solution for continuous two-way communication using a single long-lived connection.
Flow of WebSockets:
  • Handshake: Initiated by a standard HTTP request, which is then upgraded to a WebSocket if both client and server agree.
  • Data Transfer: Allows for full-duplex communication directly over a TCP connection.
  • Connection Termination: Either party can terminate the connection when no longer needed.
Ideal for applications requiring real-time interaction, WebSockets reduce latency and overhead compared to traditional HTTP connections.

Server-Sent Events (SSE)

notion image
Specially designed for server-to-client communication, SSE facilitates sending updates from the server directly to the client using a standard HTTP connection.
Flow of SSE:
  • Connection Establishment: Initiated by the client through a standard HTTP request.
  • Data Transmission: The server sends data as events occur, maintaining the open connection.
  • Client Control: The client can close the connection at any time.
SSE is particularly effective for delivering real-time notifications and updates without the complexity of handling bidirectional communication as required by WebSockets.


Choosing the right model—push or pull—depends heavily on specific system requirements such as update frequency, server load considerations, and real-time communication needs. For our project, focusing on server-to-client updates, Server-Sent Events stand out as a tailored, efficient solution, ensuring timely data delivery with minimal overhead. By clearly understanding each model's workflow and limitations, we can strategically select the architecture that best supports our objectives, paving the way for a more connected and responsive system.